Avatar

About Jon Dulin

Hi, my name is Jon and I run Penny Thots. I blog about many personal finance topics, but my specialties lie in investing, paying off debt, and achieving your financial goals. You can learn more about me on the Author Page.

Comments

  1. AvatarHelen A. says

    April 17, 2012 at 9:47 am

    I am definitely a passive investor. Originally not by choice, but because I didnt know enough about investing to be an active investor. But now that I have read your post and understand the difference, I will remain a passive investor beacuse of the things you shared and because it has always worked well for me. Thanks for the great post! I will be checking back often!

    • Avataradmin says

      April 17, 2012 at 10:17 am

      There is a lot to be said for passive investing. The results are good and the time commitment is minimal.

  2. AvatarBusyExecutiveMoneyBlog says

    April 17, 2012 at 9:43 pm

    I am also a passive investor. If professional active guys underperform the vast majority of the time, I see no reasonable way I can do better. In actuality, passive, index investing will outperform the majority of the active guys every year. I’ll take that

    • AvatarMoneySmartGuides says

      April 18, 2012 at 9:53 pm

      That’s the funny thing. Active managers rarely beat the market on a consistent basis, yet so many people still invest in those funds. My guess is because most investors simply look at the return of the fund in question and not the index, or just read an article about a ‘hot’ stock and buy in because it is ‘hot’.

  3. AvatarJeanne says

    April 17, 2012 at 9:51 pm

    I learned this the hard way. I was with an advisor who preached active management, and in a 2 year period, I didn’t really see any benefits. I have since changed advisors and the passive approach seems to be a better long term strategy.

    • Jon DulinJon Dulin says

      April 15, 2014 at 7:57 pm

      When I first began investing, I bought into the active management style myself. I think most of us do since it’s so glamorous to think we can earn a higher return. Sadly, it rarely turns out that way.

  4. AvatarElaine Colliar says

    April 18, 2012 at 8:58 am

    I figure the only people getting rich on “active investing” are those who get paid when you trade. Far easier on the blood pressure to buy well and hold long term.

    Good common sense advice though.

    • AvatarMoneySmartGuides says

      April 18, 2012 at 9:55 pm

      Investing for the long-term is easiest when you ignore the media with their hype regarding the market over the short-term. Prepare a plan that will help you meet your goals and stick to it!

  5. AvatarNick says

    April 25, 2012 at 1:12 pm

    Who needs sexy!?!? I’ll take the returns… I once ran the numbers and if it takes you 4 hours per week to beat the market by 2% (not easily accomplished) on a 50,000 portfolio then you’re making less than $5 per hour for your time (before taxes!).

    I’ll take passive investing for the vast majority of my $$. I have a few bucks that I play with but just a few and money I’m fully prepared to lose.

    • AvatarMoneySmartGuides says

      April 26, 2012 at 12:24 pm

      My time is worth much more than $5!

      I too have an account with play money. I still don’t devote much time to it and am OK with losing all of it. Luckily though that hasn’t happened yet!

  6. AvatarKyle Gisborne says

    July 3, 2012 at 2:15 am

    I like passive investing because active management can’t beat passive consistently anyway. Most of my mutual funds and ETFs are passive index. My dividend portfolio are comprised of individual stocks and I’m mostly inactive there as well.

  7. AvatarKyle says

    July 15, 2015 at 10:18 am

    I keep my active investing for my small business endeavors I work on, not the stock market.

    I’ve been a passive investor but I’ve been trying to get a more concrete understanding of why you want a bond/stock ETF mix if you’re not touching the account for decades. Most research just comes up with “it helps stabilize your investments” but isn’t that only relevant if you’re touching the money within the next 10 years? I’ve also heard an idea about when you re-balance the mix you are essentially buying low and sell high over time.
    Any Thoughts?

  8. AvatarRedeemed Finance says

    July 16, 2015 at 1:00 pm

    I always like to do a little bit of both (active vs passive). Keep the index funds in the ROTH IRA/401k and have some dividend stocks in the taxable brokerage. I’d agree that the way to go for the absolute long term is finding the lowest expense ratio funds you could find and ‘set-it and forget’.
    Rich

shares